1975 Nissan 240 C vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Renault Megane is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan 240 C | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Nissan | Renault |
Model | 240 C | Megane |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1982 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 227 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2630 mm |