1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 1963 Reliant Sabre Six
To start off, 1975 Nissan Cedric is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Reliant Sabre Six. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Reliant Sabre Six would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Reliant Sabre Six is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (108 HP) has 53 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 582 kg more than 1963 Reliant Sabre Six.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Reliant Sabre Six (185 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 58 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (127 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1963 Reliant Sabre Six will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 1963 Reliant Sabre Six | |
Make | Nissan | Reliant |
Model | Cedric | Sabre Six |
Year Released | 1975 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2553 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 55 HP | 108 HP |
Torque | 127 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1380 kg | 798 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1280 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2290 mm |