1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 1968 Rover 2000

To start off, 1975 Nissan Cedric is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,532 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Rover 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Rover 2000 (142 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Rover 2000 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 50 kg more than 1968 Rover 2000.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Rover 2000 (272 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 145 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (127 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 1968 Rover 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Nissan Cedric 1968 Rover 2000
Make Nissan Rover
Model Cedric 2000
Year Released 1975 1968
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1991 cc 3532 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 55 HP 142 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 127 Nm 272 Nm
Torque RPM 1800 RPM 2600 RPM
Fuel Type Diesel Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Weight 1380 kg 1330 kg
Vehicle Length 4700 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1450 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2640 mm