1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 1998 Renault Clio
To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,565 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Nissan Cedric (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (88 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Nissan Cedric should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 470 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 Nissan Cedric (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Renault Clio. (131 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1975 Nissan Cedric will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Nissan Cedric | 1998 Renault Clio | |
| Make | Nissan | Renault |
| Model | Cedric | Clio |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 88 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 131 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 980 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3780 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2580 mm |
