1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX
To start off, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Isuzu D-MAX is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (129 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Isuzu D-MAX weights approximately 528 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2003 Isuzu D-MAX (300 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2003 Isuzu D-MAX will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 2003 Isuzu D-MAX | |
Make | Nissan | Isuzu |
Model | Cedric | D-MAX |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 2999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 129 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 1848 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5030 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 3060 mm |