1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,983 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 145 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford Falcon weights approximately 254 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Falcon (391 Nm @ 3250 RPM) has 212 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Nissan | Ford |
Model | Cedric | Falcon |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 3983 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 261 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 391 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1704 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4967 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1868 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2838 mm |