1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2010 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 4,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (270 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 154 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 603 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota 4Runner (376 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 197 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota 4Runner will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Nissan | Toyota |
Model | Cedric | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 4000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 116 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 179 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 2053 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4823 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1925 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1816 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2789 mm |