1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2010 Volvo S80
To start off, 2010 Volvo S80 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S80 (281 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 165 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (116 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S80 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S80 weights approximately 388 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo S80 (400 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 221 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (179 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo S80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Nissan Cedric | 2010 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Nissan | Volvo |
| Model | Cedric | S80 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2565 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 116 HP | 281 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 179 Nm | 400 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1838 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4851 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1862 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1494 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2835 mm |
