1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2012 Audi RS3
To start off, 2012 Audi RS3 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2012 Audi RS3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi RS3 (335 HP) has 280 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (55 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Because 2012 Audi RS3 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Nissan Cedric. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi RS3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi RS3 (450 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 323 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (127 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2012 Audi RS3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric. 2012 Audi RS3 has automatic transmission and 1975 Nissan Cedric has manual transmission. 1975 Nissan Cedric will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Audi RS3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Nissan Cedric | 2012 Audi RS3 | |
| Make | Nissan | Audi |
| Model | Cedric | RS3 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1991 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 55 HP | 335 HP |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 450 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 1600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | AWD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 7-speed automated manual |
