1975 Nissan Cedric vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (286 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 168 more horse power than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 1975 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 794 kg more than 1975 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (353 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 137 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Nissan Cedric | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Nissan | Jeep |
Model | Cedric | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2565 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 286 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 216 Nm | 353 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 2114 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2154 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1460 mm | 1763 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2916 mm |