1975 NSU Ro 80 vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 1983 Zastava 102 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 NSU Ro 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 NSU Ro 80 would be higher. At 2,390 cc, 1975 NSU Ro 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 NSU Ro 80 (114 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 NSU Ro 80 should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 NSU Ro 80 weights approximately 440 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1975 NSU Ro 80 (163 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1975 NSU Ro 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 NSU Ro 80 | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | NSU | Zastava |
| Model | Ro 80 | 102 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 2390 cc | 1299 cc |
| Horse Power | 114 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 163 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1210 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2870 mm | 2160 mm |
