1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass vs. 2001 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2001 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 4,093 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Nissan X-Trail (177 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (104 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 295 kg more than 2001 Nissan X-Trail.
Because 2001 Nissan X-Trail is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Nissan X-Trail will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass (251 Nm @ 1200 RPM) has 6 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Nissan X-Trail. (245 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Oldsmobile Cutlass | 2001 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Oldsmobile | Nissan |
| Model | Cutlass | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4093 cc | 2487 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 104 HP | 177 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 251 Nm | 245 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1745 kg | 1450 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2850 mm | 2630 mm |
