1975 Opel Ascona vs. 1992 Renault Clio
To start off, 1992 Renault Clio is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,978 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Opel Ascona is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Opel Ascona weights approximately 200 kg more than 1992 Renault Clio.
Because 1975 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Opel Ascona | 1992 Renault Clio | |
Make | Opel | Renault |
Model | Ascona | Clio |
Year Released | 1975 | 1992 |
Engine Size | 1978 cc | 1107 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 48 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 810 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |