1975 Opel Ascona vs. 2000 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2000 Skoda Fabia is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 1,388 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Skoda Fabia is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Skoda Fabia weights approximately 116 kg more than 1975 Opel Ascona.
Because 1975 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Opel Ascona | 2000 Skoda Fabia | |
Make | Opel | Skoda |
Model | Ascona | Fabia |
Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1297 cc | 1388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 954 kg | 1070 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2470 mm |