1975 Opel Ascona vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1975 Opel Ascona. (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1975 Opel Ascona.
Because 1975 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Opel Ascona. (146 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Opel Ascona.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Opel Ascona | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Opel | Ford |
Model | Ascona | E-350 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1897 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 146 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4130 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 57 L |