1975 Opel Ascona vs. 2012 Honda CR-V
To start off, 2012 Honda CR-V is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Opel Ascona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Opel Ascona would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Honda CR-V is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Honda CR-V weights approximately 490 kg more than 1975 Opel Ascona.
Because 1975 Opel Ascona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Opel Ascona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Honda CR-V, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Honda CR-V has automatic transmission and 1975 Opel Ascona has manual transmission. 1975 Opel Ascona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Honda CR-V will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Opel Ascona | 2012 Honda CR-V | |
| Make | Opel | Honda |
| Model | Ascona | CR-V |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1978 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 184 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1010 kg | 1500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1819 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1645 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2530 mm | 2620 mm |
