1975 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2002 Alfa Romeo 147

To start off, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 72 more horse power than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147.

Because 1975 Pontiac Trans Am is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Alfa Romeo 147, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 253 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. (181 Nm). This means 1975 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Alfa Romeo 147. 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 has automatic transmission and 1975 Pontiac Trans Am has manual transmission. 1975 Pontiac Trans Am will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Alfa Romeo 147 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Pontiac Trans Am 2002 Alfa Romeo 147
Make Pontiac Alfa Romeo
Model Trans Am 147
Year Released 1975 2002
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 6556 cc 1970 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 220 HP 148 HP
Torque 434 Nm 181 Nm
Engine Bore Size 104.2 mm 83 mm
Engine Stroke Size 95.3 mm 91 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.1:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 4 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Length 5040 mm 4180 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1740 mm
Vehicle Height 1260 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2550 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]