1975 Pontiac Trans Am vs. 2010 Citroen C-Crosser
To start off, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,556 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am (220 HP) has 66 more horse power than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (154 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am should accelerate faster than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Because 2010 Citroen C-Crosser is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1975 Pontiac Trans Am. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C-Crosser will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser. (380 Nm). This means 1975 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Citroen C-Crosser.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Pontiac Trans Am | 2010 Citroen C-Crosser | |
| Make | Pontiac | Citroen |
| Model | Trans Am | C-Crosser |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6556 cc | 2179 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 220 HP | 154 HP |
| Torque | 434 Nm | 380 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.2 mm | 85 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 95.3 mm | 96 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
