1975 Renault Rodeo vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Renault Rodeo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Renault Rodeo would be higher. At 4,603 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 750 kg more than 1975 Renault Rodeo.
Because 2000 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Mustang has automatic transmission and 1975 Renault Rodeo has manual transmission. 1975 Renault Rodeo will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Mustang will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Renault Rodeo | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
| Make | Renault | Ford |
| Model | Rodeo | Mustang |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1287 cc | 4603 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 260 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 730 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4660 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1860 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
