1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue vs. 1998 Volvo S80
To start off, 1998 Volvo S80 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 774 kg more than 1998 Volvo S80.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Volvo S80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | 1998 Volvo S80 | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
| Model | Camargue | S80 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 178 HP |
| Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 81 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 77 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 220 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1581 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1840 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 80 L |
