1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue vs. 2003 Volvo C70
To start off, 2003 Volvo C70 is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 790 kg more than 2003 Volvo C70.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Volvo C70, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | 2003 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Volvo |
Model | Camargue | C70 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 206 HP |
Engine Bore Size | 104.1 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 99.1 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Top Speed | 192 km/hour | 209 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1565 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 68 L |