1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 957 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Jeep |
Model | Camargue | Commander |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 305 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 80 L |