1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue vs. 2010 Mercury Mariner
To start off, 2010 Mercury Mariner is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 840 kg more than 2010 Mercury Mariner.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mercury Mariner, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | 2010 Mercury Mariner | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Mercury |
Model | Camargue | Mariner |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 171 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4458 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1806 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 62 L |