1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue vs. 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse
To start off, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue weights approximately 860 kg more than 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Rolls-Royce Camargue | 2010 Mitsubishi Eclipse | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Camargue | Eclipse |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 2400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 162 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2355 kg | 1495 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4582 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1834 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1367 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2576 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 67 L |
