1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2004 Skoda Fabia
To start off, 2004 Skoda Fabia is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 965 kg more than 2004 Skoda Fabia.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Skoda Fabia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2004 Skoda Fabia | |
| Make | Rolls-Royce | Skoda |
| Model | Silver Shadow | Fabia |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 113 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 195 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1185 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 3970 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 7.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 45 L |
