1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow vs. 2010 Nissan Grand Livina
To start off, 2010 Nissan Grand Livina is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow weights approximately 818 kg more than 2010 Nissan Grand Livina.
Because 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Nissan Grand Livina, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | 2010 Nissan Grand Livina | |
Make | Rolls-Royce | Nissan |
Model | Silver Shadow | Grand Livina |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6750 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 108 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 185 km/hour | 180 km/hour |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2150 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5180 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1810 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1520 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3160 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.2 L/100km | 7.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 107 L | 52 L |