1975 Seat 127 vs. 2002 Suzuki Covie
To start off, 2002 Suzuki Covie is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Seat 127. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Seat 127 would be higher. At 1,999 cc, 2002 Suzuki Covie is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Suzuki Covie (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 20 more horse power than 1975 Seat 127. (47 HP @ 6200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Suzuki Covie should accelerate faster than 1975 Seat 127. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Suzuki Covie weights approximately 45 kg more than 1975 Seat 127. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Suzuki Covie (111 Nm) has 48 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Seat 127. (63 Nm). This means 2002 Suzuki Covie will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Seat 127.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Seat 127 | 2002 Suzuki Covie | |
| Make | Seat | Suzuki |
| Model | 127 | Covie |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 903 cc | 1999 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 67 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 63 Nm | 111 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 705 kg | 750 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 2950 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2230 mm | 1530 mm |
