1975 Seat 133 vs. 2004 Cadillac CTS

To start off, 2004 Cadillac CTS is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Seat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Seat 133 would be higher. At 3,173 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Cadillac CTS (215 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1975 Seat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1975 Seat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Cadillac CTS weights approximately 1100 kg more than 1975 Seat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Cadillac CTS (300 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 245 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Seat 133. (55 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2004 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Seat 133.

Compare all specifications: