1975 Toyota Corona vs. 2013 Cadillac XTS

To start off, 2013 Cadillac XTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Toyota Corona. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Toyota Corona would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac XTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac XTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 230 more horse power than 1975 Toyota Corona. (84 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS should accelerate faster than 1975 Toyota Corona. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac XTS weights approximately 817 kg more than 1975 Toyota Corona. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Toyota Corona is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Toyota Corona. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac XTS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac XTS (358 Nm @ 5200 RPM) has 223 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Toyota Corona. (135 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac XTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Toyota Corona. 2013 Cadillac XTS has automatic transmission and 1975 Toyota Corona has manual transmission. 1975 Toyota Corona will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac XTS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1975 Toyota Corona 2013 Cadillac XTS
Make Toyota Cadillac
Model Corona XTS
Year Released 1975 2013
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1587 cc 3564 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 84 HP 314 HP
Engine RPM 5600 RPM 6800 RPM
Torque 135 Nm 358 Nm
Torque RPM 3400 RPM 5200 RPM
Engine Bore Size 81 mm 94 mm
Engine Stroke Size 77 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.5:1 11.5
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual 6-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1000 kg 1817 kg
Vehicle Length 4260 mm 5131 mm
Vehicle Width 1620 mm 1852 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1510 mm
Wheelbase Size 2510 mm 2831 mm