1975 Triumph 2000 vs. 1964 Volvo 220
To start off, 1975 Triumph 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Triumph 2000 (83 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 9 more horse power than 1964 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 1964 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1964 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1964 Volvo 220 (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1964 Volvo 220 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Triumph 2000 | 1964 Volvo 220 | |
| Make | Triumph | Volvo |
| Model | 2000 | 220 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1776 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 83 HP | 74 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 144 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2900 RPM | 2300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1245 kg | 1015 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4510 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2610 mm |
