1975 Triumph Stag vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Triumph Stag. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Triumph Stag would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Audi A6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (242 HP) has 99 more horse power than 1975 Triumph Stag. (143 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1975 Triumph Stag.
Because 1975 Triumph Stag is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Triumph Stag. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Triumph Stag | 2012 Audi A6 | |
| Make | Triumph | Audi |
| Model | Stag | A6 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2997 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 143 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4430 mm | 4915 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1620 mm | 1872 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1260 mm | 1453 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2911 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 63 L | 75 L |
