1975 TVR 3000 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 TVR 3000 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | TVR | Holden |
Model | 3000 | Epica |
Year Released | 1975 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 148 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2700 mm |