1975 TVR 3000 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,993 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 85 kg more than 1975 TVR 3000.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 TVR 3000 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | TVR | Mazda |
Model | 3000 | 2 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2993 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 99 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1070 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2500 mm |