1975 TVR 3000 vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 2,992 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 TVR 3000 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Honda CR-Z weights approximately 227 kg more than 1975 TVR 3000.
Because 1975 TVR 3000 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 TVR 3000. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1975 TVR 3000 | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
Make | TVR | Honda |
Model | 3000 | CR-Z |
Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2992 cc | 1497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1020 kg | 1247 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3940 mm | 4079 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1120 mm | 1394 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2435 mm |