1975 Volvo 240 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (138 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (81 HP @ 4700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240.
Because 1975 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Cruze (167 Nm @ 3800 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (158 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Volvo 240 | 2012 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Volvo | Chevrolet |
Model | 240 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1986 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 81 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 4700 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 158 Nm | 167 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2300 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2685 mm |