1975 Volvo 240 vs. 2013 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac CTS is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Cadillac CTS (314 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 240.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Cadillac CTS (373 Nm @ 4900 RPM) has 246 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 240. (127 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2013 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Volvo 240 | 2013 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
| Model | 240 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2127 cc | 3600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 96 HP | 314 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 6800 RPM |
| Torque | 127 Nm | 373 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 4900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4877 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1842 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1473 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2880 mm |
