1975 Volvo 264 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1975 Volvo 264 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 2010 Mazda 2. (99 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1975 Volvo 264 should accelerate faster than 2010 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1975 Volvo 264 weights approximately 295 kg more than 2010 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1975 Volvo 264 (203 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Mazda 2. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1975 Volvo 264 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Mazda 2.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Volvo 264 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Volvo | Mazda |
Model | 264 | 2 |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.7:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 3930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2500 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |