1975 Volvo 264 vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 264. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 264 would be higher. At 2,664 cc (6 cylinders), 1975 Volvo 264 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 8 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 264. (140 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 264.
Because 1975 Volvo 264 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 264. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 117 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 264. (203 Nm). This means 2012 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 264.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Volvo 264 | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Volvo | Holden |
Model | 264 | Epica |
Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2664 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 203 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4900 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2650 mm | 2700 mm |