1975 Volvo 66 vs. 2010 Cadillac CTS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac CTS is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 3,000 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac CTS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac CTS (270 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 214 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac CTS should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Cadillac CTS (302 Nm) has 208 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Volvo 66. (94 Nm). This means 2010 Cadillac CTS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Volvo 66.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Volvo 66 | 2010 Cadillac CTS | |
| Make | Volvo | Cadillac |
| Model | 66 | CTS |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1289 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 56 HP | 270 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 302 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4867 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1842 mm |
