1975 Volvo 66 vs. 2010 Citroen C3
To start off, 2010 Citroen C3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,598 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Citroen C3 (118 HP @ 5660 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1975 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1975 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Citroen C3 weights approximately 545 kg more than 1975 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1975 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Volvo 66 | 2010 Citroen C3 | |
| Make | Volvo | Citroen |
| Model | 66 | C3 |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1108 cc | 1598 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 47 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5660 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 820 kg | 1365 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3910 mm | 4080 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1640 mm |
