1975 Zastava 1300 vs. 2012 Opel Combo
To start off, 2012 Opel Combo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 1300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 1300 would be higher. At 1,364 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Opel Combo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Opel Combo (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 1300. (59 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 1300.
Because 1975 Zastava 1300 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 1300. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Opel Combo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Opel Combo (126 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 1300. (94 Nm @ 3100 RPM). This means 2012 Opel Combo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 1300.
Compare all specifications:
| 1975 Zastava 1300 | 2012 Opel Combo | |
| Make | Zastava | Opel |
| Model | 1300 | Combo |
| Year Released | 1975 | 2012 |
| Engine Size | 1295 cc | 1364 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 94 Nm | 126 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3100 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4330 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1690 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2430 mm | 2720 mm |
