1975 Zastava 132 vs. 2010 Dodge Caliber
To start off, 2010 Dodge Caliber is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Caliber is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Caliber (158 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 51 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132.
Because 1975 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Caliber, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Caliber (191 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Dodge Caliber will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Zastava 132 | 2010 Dodge Caliber | |
Make | Zastava | Dodge |
Model | 132 | Caliber |
Year Released | 1975 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 191 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4415 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1748 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1534 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2634 mm |