1975 Zastava 132 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Cruze
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Chevrolet Cruze is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze (161 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 132. (107 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 132.
Because 1975 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Chevrolet Cruze (360 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 218 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2011 Chevrolet Cruze will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
1975 Zastava 132 | 2011 Chevrolet Cruze | |
Make | Zastava | Chevrolet |
Model | 132 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1975 | 2011 |
Engine Size | 1756 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 107 HP | 161 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3800 RPM |
Torque | 142 Nm | 360 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Vehicle Length | 4410 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1476 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 2685 mm |