1975 Zastava 2101 vs. 2006 Cadillac BLS

To start off, 2006 Cadillac BLS is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Zastava 2101. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Zastava 2101 would be higher. At 1,910 cc (4 cylinders), 2006 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Cadillac BLS (149 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 87 more horse power than 1975 Zastava 2101. (62 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1975 Zastava 2101. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 500 kg more than 1975 Zastava 2101. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1975 Zastava 2101 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1975 Zastava 2101. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Cadillac BLS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Cadillac BLS (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Zastava 2101. (88 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2006 Cadillac BLS will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Zastava 2101. 2006 Cadillac BLS has automatic transmission and 1975 Zastava 2101 has manual transmission. 1975 Zastava 2101 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2006 Cadillac BLS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: