1976 Abarth A 112 vs. 1967 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1976 Abarth A 112 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 7,029 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Cadillac Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 1460 kg more than 1976 Abarth A 112.
Because 1967 Cadillac Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Cadillac Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Abarth A 112 | 1967 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | Brougham |
Year Released | 1976 | 1967 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 7029 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 208 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2145 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3390 mm |