1976 Abarth A 112 vs. 2010 Cadillac Escalade
To start off, 2010 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Abarth A 112. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Abarth A 112 would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1927 kg more than 1976 Abarth A 112.
Because 2010 Cadillac Escalade is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Cadillac Escalade. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Abarth A 112, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Cadillac Escalade has automatic transmission and 1976 Abarth A 112 has manual transmission. 1976 Abarth A 112 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Cadillac Escalade will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Abarth A 112 | 2010 Cadillac Escalade | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | A 112 | Escalade |
Year Released | 1976 | 2010 |
Engine Size | 965 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 403 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 685 kg | 2612 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3240 mm | 5662 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2009 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1918 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2040 mm | 3302 mm |