1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1966 Austin A 90
To start off, 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Austin A 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Austin A 90 would be higher. At 2,912 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Austin A 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Austin A 90 weights approximately 660 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 1966 Austin A 90 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1966 Austin A 90. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1966 Austin A 90 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Austin |
Model | Alfasud | A 90 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2912 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 34 L |