1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1973 Mazda RX-3
To start off, 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Mazda RX-3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Mazda RX-3 would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1973 Mazda RX-3 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud weights approximately 58 kg more than 1973 Mazda RX-3.
Because 1973 Mazda RX-3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1973 Mazda RX-3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1973 Mazda RX-3 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Alfasud | RX-3 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 1964 cc |
Engine Type | boxer | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 852 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4090 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2320 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 50 L | 65 L |