1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud vs. 1978 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud would be higher. At 2,290 cc, 1978 Mazda RX-2 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda RX-2 weights approximately 50 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud.
Because 1978 Mazda RX-2 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda RX-2. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alfa Romeo Alfasud | 1978 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Mazda |
Model | Alfasud | RX-2 |
Year Released | 1976 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1490 cc | 2290 cc |
Engine Type | boxer | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 118 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 910 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4030 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2480 mm |