1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo vs. 1983 Jaguar XJR
To start off, 1983 Jaguar XJR is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo would be higher. At 5,343 cc (12 cylinders), 1983 Jaguar XJR is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1983 Jaguar XJR weights approximately 30 kg more than 1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1976 Alfa Romeo Navajo | 1983 Jaguar XJR | |
Make | Alfa Romeo | Jaguar |
Model | Navajo | XJR |
Year Released | 1976 | 1983 |
Engine Position | Middle | Middle |
Engine Size | 1995 cc | 5343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 228 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 870 kg | 900 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3810 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1870 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1060 mm | 1050 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2870 mm |